Neighbors protested the current design for the park proposed for the Old Town Farm property

08/17/1894 |

Category:

This afternoon, neighbors of the proposed park on the Old Town Farm property presented to the Old Town Farm Committee a petition that expressed their opposition to the park’s current design.

  1. Fred A. West read the petition to the committee, and the petition requested that:
  • The grading of the park be improved;
  • Attention be paid to the fact that the “high ground near the center of the plot” would lead to drainage into “depressions” near Ashley Street;
  • That the park not be fenced but instead be improved with new trees and shrubbery; and
  • That sidewalks, curbs and gutters be installed on May and Sargeant Streets.

He added that there was a “general dissatisfaction with the way the park had been graded and the people did not think it was finished.”

  1. Francis Goodwin spoke next, and he said that
  • “there was an opportunity to do a nice thing without great expense” although it would take “men with skill” and “competent advice” to accomplish it;
  • “the park should be made so that people would go out to see it and take there visitors to the city” and
  • “any outlay that the committee would make for the purpose would be amply indorsed by the whole community.”

Goodwin also described small parks in London and Boston, and the proposed improvements to this park “would be a great help to property nearby.”

  1. George Ulrich noted that the park would ultimately belong to the City, and he asked Goodwin if the matter should be referred to the City Parks Commission.
  2. Goodwin responded that the City would likely appropriate funds only for the maintenance of an existing park and not for the development of the proposed park.
  3. H. Hippel spoke in favor of a “curb and gutter stone” on May Street.
  4. The committee assured Hippel that the curb and gutter would be installed “if the council ordered such an improvement.”
  5. W. Parsons said that the “high ground had been used as a burial place many years ago” for “paupers” and “those persons who died from small-pox.”
  6. George Fowler said that the victims of small pox had been “buried six feet under ground” and that George Goyt had told him that “children had been buried over the others.”
  7. E. Burr said that if the proposed improvements cost $1,500, and if the town meeting opposed that amount, then “he would agree to pay the money himself.”
  8. After further discussion, George Ulrich moved that the chair of the committee be authorized to obtain “the opinions of experts on the proper manner of improving the park and the approximate expense.”
  9. The motion passed.

  1. The hearing was held in the office of the Town Selectmen.
  2. Francis Goodwin attended at the invitation of E. Burr.
  3. Other petitioners who spoke were Cameron, F. A. Cummings, and James Shipman.

  1. The article establishes that the park did not yet have a name. It refers to the park as “the proposed park on the old town farm property.”
  2. The article also establishes the existence of the Alms House’s cemetery within the park, and it gives a source for information about it: George Goyt.

  1. According to the article, Fred West said that the petition “contained 127 names.” There wasn’t apparently any independent verification of his statement.
  2. The petitioners included “property owners and residents of streets adjacent to and near the proposed park.”

The neighbors petitioned the Old Town Farm Committee, and the Committee granted them this public hearing, at some point prior to today.

  1. According to the article, all of the members of the old town farm committee were present, but it didn’t name them. The members who were identified were:
  • A. E. Burr, president of the committee
  • George Fowler
  • W. Parsons
  • George Ulrich
  1. George Goyt had been the superintendent of the alms house.

Unattributed.  “The proposed park,” Hartford Courant, August 18, 1884, page 5.

Old Town Farm
Sigourney Square Park

History


Share this: