Courant reports that Hartford Fire is gearing up to fight Broad Street Extension

10/23/1921 |

Category:

According to an article in today’s Courant, the Hartford Fire Insurance Company planned to petition the Hartford Board of Aldermen to reconsider their decision to support a layout for the extension of Broad Street from Farmington Avenue to Garden Street and that the matter be referred back to the Hartford Board of Street Commissioners with instructions to hold another hearing.

  1. The adopted layout for the Broad Street Extension had been suggested by Newton Brainard and recommended by the Hartford Board of Street Commissioners.
  2. Officials of Hartford Fire claimed that the city had broken a tacit agreement to lay the street out in accordance with a plan suggested by them, in return for which the company would make no claim for damages.
  3. According to company officials, the current plan would force the company to remove 12 feet of granite steps and sidewalks that it had already installed at its new building. The company would also be forced to install a retaining wall on the Broad Street side of the building.
  4. The company officials stated that they had not discovered that “a change had been made in the proposed layout until a few days ago” and added that they would file a claim for damages if the plan was implemented.
  5. The Courant reported that it was “understood that several city officials who are familiar with the matter are opposed to a reconsideration, claiming that the street should be put through according to the latest plan, which it is hoped will eventually make it a through street and relieve the already congested condition of the city.”

There were several other matters that were anticipated to be on the agenda of the next meeting of the Hartford Board of Aldermen:

  1. The Hartford Board of Aldermen were expected to finally consider a petition from Travelers Insurance Company for an overhead bridge between their two buildings on Grove Street. The board had already postponed taking action twice, so it seemed “hardly possible that the aldermen tomorrow night will again defer action on the petition which has now been on the council table for several weeks.”
  2. The Hartford Board of Finance was expected to submit recommendations on extra appropriations, including for the unemployment fund and in order to settle a claim by Norcross Brothers, which had worked on the construction of the new Municipal Building.
  3. The Board of Finance was also expected to consider an appeal of an assessment on the Underwood Typewriter Company – the city had valued the property at $2,432,000, while an appraiser hired by the company came in with a value of $880,000.
  4. The Ordinance Committee was expected to submit two proposed ordinances, one to restrict construction of “undesirable structures” within residential and semi-residential sections of the city, and the other to restrict the construction of billboards in the city.
  5. The Railroad Committee would report on two competing proposals for a Maple Avenue bus line, one favored by the residents and the other favored by the company that would run the line.
  6. The Pensions Committee would report on pensions for city employees.

No source was given for the reporting on the city officials who opposed reconsideration of this matter.

The Hartford Fire Insurance Company had offered the city a piece of the property it was buying in exchange for a commitment to alter the layout of the Broad Street Extension on June 11, 1919.

The Hartford Fire Insurance Company signaled its opposition to a widening of Asylum Avenue on September 18, 1921.

  1. Lucius Robinson will persuade the Hartford Board of Street Commissioners to postpone its hearing on the proposed Broad Street Extension on October 26, 1921.
  2. Hartford Fire would begin to prepare for its move to its new building on October 29, 1921.

The adjectival form of “alderman” is “aldermanic.”

  1. Newton Brainard was mayor of Hartford.
  2. The “several city officials” weren’t wrong: the Broad Street Extension wouldn’t be opened for another decade.

Unattributed, “Extension of Broad Street is again up for council action,” Hartford Courant, October 23, 1921, page 16.

The Hartford

History


Share this: